Re: The John Cooleys 1840 MO

From: The Cooleys <lvcooley5_at_cox.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:38:31 -0700

If I'm connecting the dots right would that make John of Randolph County
the son of Perrin?

Jim



On 6/24/2012 3:27 PM, Michael Cooley wrote:
> DANIEL'S SON:
>
> Carroll County - Series: M704 Roll: 221
>
> p 296 John Cooley, Grand River Twp
> 00111001-0110301
> 1 male 10-14 John A Cooley (1829-)
> 1 male 15-19 Nathaniel G Cooley (1824-)
> 1 male 20-29 Thomas H Cooley
> 1 male 50-59 John W Cooley (1790-1857)
> 1 female 5-9 Mariah Cooley (1834-)
> 1 female 10-14 ?
> 3 females 20-29 Emily Cooley (1822-), Polly Cooley (1825-), Sydney Cooley
> (1826-)
> 1 female 40-49 Mahala Hardwick (1792-1857)
>
> JOSEPH'S SON:
>
> Howard County - Series: M704 Roll: 224
> p 8 John Cooley, Richmond Township
> 1121201-1212001
> 1 male 0-4 Randolph Harrison Cooley (1838-)
> 1 male 5-9 Washington Talbert Cooley (1832-1861)
> 2 males 10-14 Edward Demarcus Cooley (1827-), John Cooley (1830)
> 1 male 15-19 Thomas KW Cooley (1820-1864)
> 1 male 40-50 John Cooley (1793-1844)
> 1 female 0-4 Eveline Cooley (1836-1863)
> 2 females 5-9 Elvira Cooley (1833-), Margaret Catherine Cooley (1835-)
> 1 female 10-14 Nancy Cooley (1828-)
> 2 females 15-19 Martha Jane Cooley (1823-), Eliza Ann Cooley (1824-)
> 1 female 40-50 Elizabeth White
>
> PROBABLY JIM'S ANCESTOR:
>
> Randolph County - Series: M704 Roll: 229
> p 283 John Cooley
> 210001-01100101
> 2 males 0-4 E C Cooley (1834-1922), ? poss husband of Nancy
> 1 male 5-9 Milo C Cooley (1840-1919)
> 1 male 30-39 John Cooley, poss s/o James
> 1 female 5-9 Elizabeth Cooley (1833-)
> 1 female 10-14 Julia Ann Cooley
> 1 female 30-39 poss Martha Bearden
> 1 female 50-59 ?
>
> Some of you may recall the correspondence Jim, Sandy and I had about this
> John. We strongly considered that he was John H Cooley that was born
> c1812, son of James. This could be him but if we take both age estimates
> literally, it would not be.
>
> Knowing John's birthplace would help since we know that none of these
> Cooleys would have been born in MO before 1811. On the 1880 census, EC
> gives his parents born in NC, which would point to someone other than John
> H, James's son. But in subsequent census records, father is listed as
> being born in MO. Personally, I'm more ready to accept the NC birth, but
> we can't be sure.
>
> EC and Milo appear to have had different mothers, leading us to consider
> that John's first wife may have been Eliza Locke. Julia Ann is listed in
> 1880 with Martha with birthplace of VA. I think Martha may have been
> married before she married John.
>
> But we've been down this road before. In any case, I'm ever more convinced
> that the John of Randolph county is Jim's John.
>
> -Michael
>
> --
> <a href="http://newsummer.com/distlist">distlist 0.9</a>
> See http://ancestraldata.com/listarchive/johncooleylist/ for list information.
>
Received on Sun Jun 24 2012 - 20:38:11 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Jun 24 2012 - 20:38:14 MDT