Re: The William Cooleys

From: Sandra Stanton <>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:24:34 -0700 (PDT)

Now why did my message end up like this?

----- Original Message ----
From: Sandra Stanton <>
To: John Cooley Mailing List <>
Sent: Sun, June 24, 2012 1:59:24 PM
Subject: Re: The William Cooleys

Michael,=0AI think you are right on with your thinking.=A0 I have never had=
anything for =0AWilliam son of James, but I agree with you that this has t=
o be him. I decided to =0Acheck family trees at Ancestry and this William i=
s=A0listed but with no parents =0Agiven.=A0 However, the person has him lis=
ted as William C. Cooley and I would like =0Ato see some docments that he h=
as signed to see if the middle C is just his mark.=0ASandra=0A=0A=0A----- O=
riginal Message ----=0AFrom: Michael Cooley <>=0ATo: J=
ohn Cooley Mailing List <>=0ASent: Sun=
, June 24, 2012 12:00:48 PM=0ASubject: The William Cooleys=0A=0AI'm continu=
ing work on the 1840 census transcriptions for Missouri at=0Ahttp://ancestr= a look at this (the name a=
re, of course, my guesses). They wre living=0Anext to the Ballingers:=0A=0A=
--quote--=0A=0ARandolph County - Series: M704 Roll: 229=0Ap 283 William Coo=
ley=0A=A0=A0=A0 210001-00001=0A=A0=A0=A0 2 males 0-4=A0=A0=A0 William Coole=
y (c1835-)=0A=A0=A0=A0 1 male 5-9=A0=A0=A0 James Cooley (c1833-)=0A=A0=A0=
=A0 1 male 30-39=A0=A0=A0 William Cooley=0A=A0=A0=A0 1 female 20-29=A0=A0=
=A0 Sarah J Ballinger (2nd wife)=0A=0A--edquote--=0A=0AAnd compare to this:=
=0A=0A--quote--=0A=0A1850 > MISSOURI > MACON > 52-DIST=0ASeries: M432 Roll:=
405 Page: 179=0A=0AWilliam Cooley 47 SC=0ASarah J " 33 SC=0AJames " 17 MO=
=0AWilliam " 15 MO=0AMartha " 8 MO=0AJonathan " 5 MO=0ACasseldana " 3 MO=0A=
Sarah J " 6/12 MO=0A=0ALiving next door is John Ballenger, 67, born VA.=0A=
=0A--endquote--=0A=0AWilliam married Sarah Nallinger 1839, his second wife.=
=0A=0AI have this William placed as a son of James, but he is too old to ha=
ve=0Abeen James's son. The only other place he fits is as a son of Perrin,=
=0Awhich provides a tad more sense to the early census records (1800 and=0A=
1810) for him.=0A=0ABut, for Perrin, I have the William born 1819 who marri=
ed Andrews. Iyt's=0Amy contention, now, that -he- was James's son.=0A=0AAny=
thoughts?=0A=0A-Michael=0A=0A--=0A<a href=3D"
">distlist 0.9</a>=0ASee
t/ for list information.=0A

<a href="">distlist 0.9</a>
See for list information.
Received on Sun Jun 24 2012 - 16:24:37 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Jun 24 2012 - 16:24:37 MDT