[List] William "Chooley"
michael at newsummer.com
Fri May 18 11:25:19 PDT 2007
Doing a census-wide index search on Chorley shows a lot of that name from
England. It looks like a legit name. However, looking at the entry for Rubin
and comparing it against the other R's on the page I'd say that it was
definitely intended to be written as Chooley. But how odd is that? Two
Chooleys on the same census would suggest it wasn't an error--I mean in the
sense that the writer really may have believed the name would be spelled that
way. Could he have thought it was pronounced Khooley--a silent H. I certainly
wouldn't understand the reasoning for that, though. I'd think our best chance
of knowing for sure would be to look at a platt map, if one existed. The only
other name on that page that I recognise as possibly being even remotely
associated with the Cooleys is "Roler". Nevertheless, for the record, here's
how I read this entry:
Ruben Chooley 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
On Fri, 18 May 2007 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), Sandra Stanton wrote
> On HQ the possible Reubin Cooley is indexed as
> Chorley, Ruben in Washington County, Kentucky.
> On Ancestry the index says Charley, Ruben.
> --- michael at newsummer.com wrote:
> > In going over the list archive, I found this from
> > Sandy Stanton:
> > --quote--
> > There are a couple of possibilities for Reuben
> > Cooley
> > in the 1820 census.
> > 1. Reubin Chooley/Charley in Washington Co, KY on
> > the
> > 1820 census. However it gives his age as 45 and up.
> > But the Reubin Cooley we are looking for would have
> > been 41. Of course someone could have given the age
> > wrong.
> > 2. Reubin Cooly on the 1820 census for Lawrence Co,
> > IN. Lawrence county is not far from Bartholomew
> > county
> > and the Ky border is a few counties away. The way
> > these Cooleys moved around do you think he
> > [Reuben]could have left for a few years and then
> > went
> > back to Ky?
> > Also, there is a William Charley/Chooley on the
> > Washington county, KY census for 1820. I don't
> > remember but have we lost a William Cooley at that
> > time? The two names following William Chooley are
> > Susan Salley and then Nancy Salley. Since there are
> > Salleys marrying into the Cooley families this might
> > need to be further searched.
> > --endquote--
> > First, I did a search for Chooley on HQ's census
> > index. Perhaps there's a
> > couple of missing Cooleys here:
> > CHOOLEY ADDIE C 51 F W IN IN ELKHART 5-WD; ELKHART;
> > CONCORD TWP 1920
> > CHOOLEY CLAIRE P 44 M W WI OR JACKSON 2-WD ASHLAND
> > 1910
> > CHOOLEY KATHARINE 26 F W PA PA ADAMS MT PLEASANT TWP
> > 1900
> > CHOOLEY SAMUEL S 63 M W OH CA LOS ANGELES LOS
> > ANGELES 1920
> > CHOOLEY UNA 49 M W MO OR MULTNOMAH PORTLAND; 41-PCT
> > 1920
> > CHOOLEY WM KY WASHINGTON NO TWP LISTED 1820
> > Apparently, a William Cooley married Martha Salley.
> > See this page:
> > http://www.pseudoprime.com/genealogy/i862.html
> > Here are my readings for William and his Salley
> > neighbors in 1820:
> > Wm Chooley 2 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0
> > Susan Salley 0 1 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
> > 1 1 1
> > Nancy Salley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 ? 2
> > Phillip Salley 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1
> > The eldest male in William's household was 26-45 and
> > the eldest female was
> > 16-26. There seems little doubt that Nancy was the
> > Salley matriarch.
> > Sandy, I'm not finding the 1820 listing for Reubin.
> > -Michael
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > List mailing list
> > List at johncooley.net
> > http://lists.johncooley.net/mailman/listinfo/list
More information about the List